chore: improve rpcresponseFactoryTest #1149
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new test methods in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant RpcResponseFactory
participant RpcFactoryHelper
Client->>RpcResponseFactory: requestNewResponse(args)
RpcResponseFactory->>RpcFactoryHelper: newResponse(args)
alt args are null
RpcFactoryHelper-->>RpcResponseFactory: return (0, "OK")
else args are variadic numbers
RpcFactoryHelper-->>RpcResponseFactory: return formatted response
else args are variadic strings
RpcFactoryHelper-->>RpcResponseFactory: return formatted response
end
RpcResponseFactory-->>Client: return response
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- jraft-core/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/rpc/RpcResponseFactoryTest.java (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
jraft-core/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/rpc/RpcResponseFactoryTest.java (3)
29-34: LGTM!The new test method
testNewResponseWithNullis correctly implemented and covers a valid scenario.
52-56: LGTM!The test method
testNewResponseWithVaridicNumberArgsis correctly implemented and the name change improves clarity.
59-65: LGTM!The new test method
testNewResponseWithVaridicStringArgsis correctly implemented and covers a valid scenario.
|
Recently I have some time to learn sofa-jraft, but I find it a bit difficult to go deep directly. I think I should start with unit testing. If I can improve it in the process of learning unit testing, I believe I will do my best to improve it so that future contributors can learn. I hope to help sofa-jraft add new features in the near future. This is a long process. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- jraft-core/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/rpc/RpcResponseFactoryTest.java (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- jraft-core/src/test/java/com/alipay/sofa/jraft/rpc/RpcResponseFactoryTest.java
Motivation:
Explain the context, and why you're making that change.
To make others understand what is the problem you're trying to solve.
Modification:
Describe the idea and modifications you've done.
Result:
Fixes #.
If there is no issue then describe the changes introduced by this PR.
Summary by CodeRabbit